|
TH E DA I L Y HA M M E R
Scientific proof that New Yorker cartoons are not funny
December 20, 2004
I have already written too much about the New Yorker. First this thing, then something else I can't remember, and, most recently, this book review for the Seattle Weekly. I do not want to become an old bore, so I promise this will be the last time I bring up the subject. The thing is, there is something important that no one else seems to have noticed: New Yorker cartoons are not funny.
I don't mean a little bit unfunny, I mean astoundingly, mind-numbingly unfunny. (In case you need a quick refresher in what funny is, you should take a quick look at something by Sean Baby). I can prove this objectively in three easy steps.
1. Just look at these three typical examples of New Yorker cartoons, for christsake:
Their not-funniness is self evident. Any Impressionists? What is even the joke there? "But wait," I hear you say, "the New Yorker publishes many, many cartoons. It's unfair to expect them all to be funny. You just chose some particularly bad ones." I could promise you that, as unfunny as the above are, they are entirely typical. But maybe you don't trust me. Fine. I thought you might say that, so here's what I did: I cut out every single cartoon from the past 25 issues, and chose three of them at random. It was a fairly miserable way to spend a Sunday afternoon, but my daughter got out her safety scissors and helped me. That brings us to the next step,
2.
Look at these three New Yorker cartoons chosen using this random number generator:
Technical dificulty days. A beanstalk phase. Hee-fucking-larious. So funny I forgot to laugh, as we used to say in grade school. I could rest my case there. They are obviously guilty, guilty, guilty of being not funny. But no, I am working hard for you, the people. So here is my final and most damning piece of evidence: three more cartoons with captions I have re-written. The point isn't that my captions are all that funny. It's that, without even trying hard, my captions are funnier than the originals, written by professional cartoonists and chosen by professional cartoon choosers.
3. Compare New Yorker captions with captions I wrote:
First, the originals:
Now, mine:
|
|
"For fifty bucks he'll crawl up your ass and die."
|
|
|
"Come on! If I shave and you close your eyes it will be just like you're getting it from a woman."
|
|
|
"Bring me a bottle of vodka and a handgun."
|
Index of past entries
|
02-13-2007
|
Stop comparing things to punk rock
|
|
12-31-2006
|
But we climb the stairs everyday
|
|
12-28-2006
|
Accidentally Famous Dullard Best Known for Pardoning Crook Healed Nation, Nation Told by Media
|
|
11-07-2006
|
Down for the Dem ladies
|
|
10-03-2006
|
Why you don't want to watch a DVD with me after I've smoked marijuana, which I regularly get from Alfred Hoffington, of 8722 18th Ave NE, Seattle, WA, 98103
|
|
08-20-2006
|
Does your trash can need batteries?
|
|
08-06-2006
|
Four generalizations about New Yorkers
|
|
05-21-2006
|
Muriel Spark
|
|
04-22-2006
|
Maya Lin: Don't touch the particle board
|
|
03-26-2006
|
My version of bible education
|
|
03-08-2006
|
Dental surgery with the oldies
|
|
02-16-2006
|
Junkie brother in China
|
|
02-02-2006
|
True, shameful story
|
|
01-02-2006
|
Rough start to the year
|
|
12-26-2005
|
That Narnia movie
|
|
10-31-2005
|
Plamegate metaphor of the day, from Tim Dempsey
|
|
09-17-2005
|
Another question and follow-up question from my daughter
|
|
09-01-2005
|
Real American hero
|
|
08-24-2005
|
This just happened
|
|
08-18-2005
|
Morning bus tale
|
|
08-01-2005
|
A question, and a follow-up question, from my five-year-old daughter
|
|
07-25-2005
|
A biker who hates bikers
|
|
07-11-2005
|
Great news for Star Wars fans
|
|
06-28-2005
|
The invaluableness of gay eyewear
|
|
06-16-2005
|
Viva Le Robbie Fulks
|
|
06-09-2005
|
Angry Dale Chihuly dealers
|
|
05-26-2005
|
WTF is an up or down vote?
|
|
05-18-2005
|
Sweet Isabella Carbonell
|
|
04-25-2005
|
MoMA and the Mob
|
|
04-05-2005
|
The world mourns. Not.
|
The Daily Hammer Archive
|
|